From 20017ca5e6bc433bab2ba5f450b93499627fbfed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Crypt Keeper <64215+codefromthecrypt@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 07:31:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] shows implementation impact of UnimplementedFile (#1424)

Signed-off-by: Adrian Cole <adrian@tetrate.io>
---
 internal/platform/file_test.go | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 internal/platform/file_test.go

diff --git a/internal/platform/file_test.go b/internal/platform/file_test.go
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5a8c100c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internal/platform/file_test.go
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+package platform
+
+import (
+	"io/fs"
+	"syscall"
+)
+
+var _ File = NoopFile{}
+
+// NoopFile shows the minimal methods a type embedding UnimplementedFile must
+// implement.
+type NoopFile struct {
+	UnimplementedFile
+}
+
+// The current design requires the user to consciously implement Close.
+// However, we could change UnimplementedFile to return zero.
+func (n NoopFile) Close() (errno syscall.Errno) { return }
+
+// Once File.File is removed, it will be possible to implement NoopFile.
+func (n NoopFile) File() fs.File { panic("noop") }