# Policy System Fix Summary ## Issues Identified and Fixed ### 1. Test Compilation Issues **Problem**: The `comprehensive_test.go` file had missing imports and couldn't compile. **Fix**: Added the necessary imports (`time`, `event`, `tag`) and helper functions. ### 2. Critical Evaluation Order Bug **Problem**: The policy evaluation order didn't match user expectations, particularly around the interaction between privileged events and allow lists. **Original Behavior**: - Privileged access always overrode allow lists - Allow lists didn't properly grant access when users were found **Fixed Behavior**: - When BOTH `privileged: true` AND allow lists exist, allow lists are authoritative - Users in allow lists are properly granted access - Privileged access only applies when no allow lists are specified ### 3. Missing Return Statements **Problem**: When users were found in allow lists, the code didn't return `true` immediately but continued to other checks. **Fix**: Added `return true, nil` statements after confirming user is in allow list. ## Corrected Policy Evaluation Order 1. **Universal Constraints** (size, tags, timestamps) - Apply to everyone 2. **Explicit Denials** (deny lists) - Highest priority blacklist 3. **Privileged Access** - Grants access ONLY if no allow lists exist 4. **Exclusive Allow Lists** - When present, ONLY listed users get access 5. **Privileged Final Check** - Deny non-involved users for privileged events 6. **Default Policy** - Fallback when no rules apply ## Key Behavioral Changes ### Before Fix: - Privileged users (author, p-tagged) could access events even if not in allow lists - Allow lists were not properly returning true when users were found - Test inconsistencies due to missing binary cache population ### After Fix: - Allow lists are authoritative when present (even over privileged access) - Proper immediate return when user is found in allow list - All tests pass including comprehensive requirements test ## Test Results All 5 requirements from Issue #5 are verified and passing: - ✅ Requirement 1: Kind whitelist enforcement - ✅ Scenario A: Write access control - ✅ Scenario B: Read access control - ✅ Scenario C: Privileged events (parties involved) - ✅ Scenario D: Script-based validation ## Important Configuration Notes When configuring policies: 1. **Allow lists are EXCLUSIVE**: If you specify `write_allow` or `read_allow`, ONLY those users can access. 2. **Privileged + Allow Lists**: If you use both `privileged: true` AND allow lists, the allow list wins - even the author must be in the allow list. 3. **Privileged Only**: If you use `privileged: true` without allow lists, parties involved get automatic access. 4. **Deny Lists Trump All**: Users in deny lists are always denied, regardless of other settings. ## Files Modified 1. `/pkg/policy/policy.go` - Fixed evaluation order and added proper returns 2. `/pkg/policy/comprehensive_test.go` - Fixed imports and compilation 3. `/docs/POLICY_TROUBLESHOOTING.md` - Updated documentation with correct behavior 4. `/docs/POLICY_FIX_SUMMARY.md` - This summary document ## Verification Run tests to verify all fixes: ```bash # Run comprehensive requirements test CGO_ENABLED=0 go test -v -run TestPolicyDefinitionOfDone ./pkg/policy # Run all policy tests CGO_ENABLED=0 go test ./pkg/policy ```