Add exhaustive test for group functions on a low-order subgroup

We observe that when changing the b-value in the elliptic curve formula
`y^2 = x^3 + ax + b`, the group law is unchanged. Therefore our functions
for secp256k1 will be correct if and only if they are correct when applied
to the curve defined by `y^2 = x^3 + 4` defined over the same field. This
curve has a point P of order 199.

This commit adds a test which computes the subgroup generated by P and
exhaustively checks that addition of every pair of points gives the correct
result.

Unfortunately we cannot test const-time scalar multiplication by the same
mechanism. The reason is that these ecmult functions both compute a wNAF
representation of the scalar, and this representation is tied to the order
of the group.

Testing with the incomplete version of gej_add_ge (found in 5de4c5dff^)
shows that this detects the incompleteness when adding P - 106P, which
is exactly what we expected since 106 is a cube root of 1 mod 199.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Poelstra
2015-09-17 18:54:52 -05:00
parent 80773a6b74
commit 20b8877be1
7 changed files with 229 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(experimental,
[use_experimental=$enableval],
[use_experimental=no])
AC_ARG_ENABLE(exhaustive_tests,
AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-exhaustive-tests],[compile exhaustive tests (default is yes)]),
[use_exhaustive_tests=$enableval],
[use_exhaustive_tests=yes])
AC_ARG_ENABLE(endomorphism,
AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-endomorphism],[enable endomorphism (default is no)]),
[use_endomorphism=$enableval],
@@ -456,6 +461,7 @@ AC_SUBST(SECP_LIBS)
AC_SUBST(SECP_TEST_LIBS)
AC_SUBST(SECP_TEST_INCLUDES)
AM_CONDITIONAL([USE_TESTS], [test x"$use_tests" != x"no"])
AM_CONDITIONAL([USE_EXHAUSTIVE_TESTS], [test x"$use_exhaustive_tests" != x"no"])
AM_CONDITIONAL([USE_BENCHMARK], [test x"$use_benchmark" = x"yes"])
AM_CONDITIONAL([USE_ECMULT_STATIC_PRECOMPUTATION], [test x"$set_precomp" = x"yes"])
AM_CONDITIONAL([ENABLE_MODULE_ECDH], [test x"$enable_module_ecdh" = x"yes"])